I've just read the NZ Institute's report (PDF) on this country's competitiveness, based on World Economic Forum data.
Some good recommendations, as far as I can tell. Key areas for improvement are innovation, and we as a nation need to enable this.
However, the language of the report, particularly the all-important last slide (Policy implications for New Zealand) is just not accessible.
Perhaps the argument is that policymakers are used to dealing with dry, abstract language. That may be so. But...
Isn't it better, if you're painting a goal, to paint that goal and vision in as vivid terms as possible? When you're making recommendations, if you show me what the outcomes of those recommendations are, and why those recommendations are needed?
I also suggest this because policy ultimately needs us all to deliver it. Government may propose, but the people dispose. Public servants, local governments, business people and ordinary citizens all make policy happen. Let's embrace that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment